Is a poem
entitled untitled
really devoid in
a titular sense?
Share this:
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
answers.com informs me:
tit·u·lar (tĭch’ə-lər)
adj.
Relating to, having the nature of, or constituting a title.
Existing in name only; nominal: the titular head of the family.
Bearing the title of a church or monastery that is no longer active.
Bearing a title: titular dignitaries.
Derived from a title: the titular role in a play.
n.
One who holds a title.
so….
yes.
When I first wrote the word “titular,” I thought that I had made it up, and i was proud of myself, so you can imagine my disappointment when firefox did not underline it in red after i pasted it in. i liked it because it sounded like tits, which has nothing to do with that poem.
well… of course…
and thats why its so beautiful in here..
that’s kind of puzzling but I would say no it isn’t devoid of a title since it’s named untitled